Case LawHigh Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sa...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sanjay Ishwarlal Ranka

High Court 10 Dec 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sanjay Ishwarlal Ranka
Date of order
10 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sanjay Ishwarlal Ranka, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEETIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. INCOME TAX APPEAL (itl) No. 61 OF 2015 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sanjay Ishwarlal Ranka ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coramappearances, Court’s orders or directionsand Registrar’s orders. Courts’s or Judge’s orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Coram : B.P .Dharmadhikari andV.M.Deshpande, JJ. th DECEMBER, 2015 Date : 10 Heard Advocate Mohta for the appellant and Advocate Dewani for the respondent. Advocate Mohta relies upon the order dated 27.8.2015 in Income Tax Appeal No. 147 of 2013 to urge that identical issue has been admitted by this Court for final hearing. Advocate Dewani submits that the assessment year is 2008-2009 and in relation to very same assessee this Court for the assessment year has rejected same challenge raised by the Department in ITL No. 8 of 2013 on 24.10.2013 and thereafter in Itl No. 94/13 on 25.6.2015. He also states that this adjudication has attained finality. According to him, thus when in earlier assessment years, the assessee has not been accepted as a trader-in- /TA/ Mr.Mohta submits that income from dividend on shares and mutual funds for the assessment year under consideration is only Rs.9,46,590/- while the business income from share transactions is shown as Rs.51,14,008 in the assessment order. This statement is reversed by CIT (Appeal) and that reversal has been maintained by the ITAT. In this background when in earlier assessment years the nature of business has already been gone into by this Court and it has attained finality, the only quantum mentioned in Assessment Order by itself cannot be a decisive factor. We, therefore, find that no substantial question of law arises. Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan