The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax } v. Shri Vijay Sudhakar Khachane }

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION JayantVishwanathINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 517 OF 2016Salunke Digitally signed byJayant VishwanathSalunkeDate: 2018.09.0712:39:17 +0530 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax}AppellantversusShri Vijay Sudhakar Khachane}Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 523 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax}AppellantversusM/s. Calibre Chemicals Pvt.Ltd.}Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 524 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax}AppellantversusRishiroop Rubber International Ltd.}Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 525 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax}AppellantversusM/s. Nandkishore and Co.}Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 526 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax}AppellantversusM/s. Sandeep Shrivastava}Respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 617 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2}AppellantversusNetScout Systems India Pvt. Ltd.}Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 619 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax}AppellantversusNetScout Systems India Pvt. Ltd.}Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellants. Mr. S. S. Shetty for the respondent inITXA/523/2016. Mr. Jitendra Singh for the respondent inITXA/524/2016. Ms. Rutuja Pawar I/b. Mr. S. C. Tiwari forthe respondent in ITXA/525/2016. Mr. Aasifa Khan I/b. Mr. Sameer Dalal forthe respondent in ITXA/526/2016. CORAM :-S. C. DHARMADHIKARI &B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE :- SEPTEMBER 5, 2018 P.C. :- 1. 1.Mr. Suresh Kumar, on instructions, states that the Revenuemay be allowed to withdraw these appeals. They are withdrawnin the light of the circular issued by the Revenue whichdetermines the limit of monetary sums or the sum above whichalone the appeals of the Revenue are to be pressed. Every appealinvolving a sum mentioned below this limit would not be pressedand on the Revenue's request, the court may dismiss it aswithdrawn. 2.We have found that the Revenue is withdrawing the appeals,which are pending admission. It is for the Revenue to decide andwithdraw the appeals based on its circular, but we clarify that wehave expressed no opinion on the proposed questions of law noron the legality and validity of the circular. 3.By clarifying as above, the appeals are allowed to bewithdrawn and stand disposed of as such. (B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)