Case Law › High Court › The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Centr...

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Pune v. Zakrullah Choudhary

High Court 17 Sep 2018 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Sep 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central), Pune v. Zakrullah Choudhary, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: Singh, this appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

suresh 53-ITXA-535.2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.535 OF 2016 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-(Central), Pune Vs.Zakrullah Choudhary .... Appellant .... Respondent Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellant.None present for the Respondent. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 P.C: 1.Mr. Tejveer Singh states that he has receivedinstructions from Senior Revenue Official not to press thisappeal because of the low tax effect. In view of theseinstructions received by Mr. Singh, this appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn. However, we clarify that the questions proposed bythe Revenue in this appeal are kept open for consideration in anappropriate case. Page 1 of 2 suresh 53-ITXA-535.2016.doc 2.Refund of Court fee as per rules. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) Digitally signedSureshby SureshJagdishJagdishSajnawatDate:Sajnawat2018.09.1915:18:49 +0530 Page 2 of 2

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.