The Pr.commissioner Of Income-2, Pune v. M/S.prathamesh Constructions
High Court
31 Mar 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Pr.commissioner Of Income-2, Pune v. M/S.prathamesh Constructions
Date of order
31 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr.commissioner Of Income-2, Pune v. M/S.prathamesh Constructions, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 607 OF 2017
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 211 OF 2017
The Pr.Commissioner of Income-2, Punevs.M/s.Prathamesh Constructions...Respondent
...Applicant/Appellant
Ms.Namita Shirke I/b. Charanjeet Chanderpal for Applicant.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & S.C. GUPTE, JJ.
DATED : 31 MARCH 2017
P.C. :
1This notice of motion has been taken out seeking condonationof one day's delay in filing the appeal from the order of the Tribunal dated20 September 2016.
2We have perused the affidavit in support of the notice ofmotion and are satisfied with the reasons mentioned therein for the delayin filing the appeal.
3Accordingly, the notice of motion is allowed in terms of prayerclause (a).
(S.C. GUPTE, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue