The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Haier Appliances India Pvt.ltd
High Court
29 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Haier Appliances India Pvt.ltd
Date of order
29 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Haier Appliances India Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of above, the present appeal is disposed of as infructuous without making any comment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 278/2018 & CM.8723/2018
THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate
versus
HAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT.LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Aniket D. Agrawal, Advocate Through: Mr.Aniket D. Agrawal, Advocate
..... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
O R D E R
%
29.11.2018
Counsel for the parties submit that the present appeal filed by the Revenue has become infructuous in view of the order dated 1[st] September, 2017 passed in the appeal [ITA No.563/2017] filed by the assessee. As per the said order, the issue in question has been remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision.
In view of above, the present appeal is disposed of as infructuous without making any comment. In view of the aforesaid position, we need not examine and pass any order in the application [CM.8723/2018] filed by the revenue for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
NOVEMBER 29, 2018 ssn
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue