The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. Jagson International Ltd
High Court
26 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. Jagson International Ltd
Date of order
26 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. Jagson International Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Issue: 2.The issue raised in the present appeal by the Revenue is whether a drilling rig is a qualifying ship within the meaning of Section 115VD of the Act.
Decision: 5.Recording the above, the appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~24
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 1165/2018
THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.
versus
JAGSON INTERNATIONAL LTD. ..... Respondent
Through: Dr. Shashwat Bajpai, Mr. Rajiv Sakana, Mr. Shard Agarwal and Mr. Ajit Kumar Jha, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
%
O R D E R26.10.2018
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the present appeal may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 1[st] June, 2018, passed in ITA No. 661/2018, The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-I (International Taxation) versus General Electric Power Systems INC. It is stated that this would be in consonance with Sections 158A and 158AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) though these provisions are not strictly applicable. 2.The issue raised in the present appeal by the Revenue is whether a drilling rig is a qualifying ship within the meaning of Section 115VD of the Act.
3.This issue is covered by decision of the Delhi High Court dated 8[th]November, 2012, in ITA No. 1395/2010, The Commissioner of Income Tax
New Delhi versus Jagson International Limited, against the Revenue and in favour of the respondent-assessee. Appeal against the said decision is pending before the Supreme Court as Special Leave Petition has been admitted/leave granted.
4.Counsel for the parties submit that ruling by the Supreme Court would equally apply in the present appeal.
5.Recording the above, the appeal is disposed of. In case of any lis/difficulty, it will be open to the parties to file an application in this appeal after decision of the Supreme Court.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
OCTOBER 26, 2018 MR
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.