Case LawHigh Court › The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. M...

The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd

High Court 05 Oct 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd
Date of order
05 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-6 v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 694/2016 THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... AppellantThrough : Sh. Ruchir Bhatia and Sh. Puneet Rai, Advocates. versus MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA ..... Respondent % O R D E R05.10.2016 This Court notices that the question of law urged, i.e. the Tribunal’s powers to extend the period of stay beyond the 365 days’ period has been explained and read down by this Court in Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT 376 ITR 87. In the circumstances, the question of law urged does not arise. At the same time, the Tribunal is directed to expedite the hearing and deliver its final verdict with utmost despatch. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J OCTOBER 05, 2016/ajk DEEPA SHARMA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan