The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax Faridabad v. M/S Jindal Steel & Power Ltd
High Court
04 Jul 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax Faridabad v. M/S Jindal Steel & Power Ltd
Date of order
04 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax Faridabad v. M/S Jindal Steel & Power Ltd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
TTA-72-2021Date of Decision: 04.07.2022
The Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax Faridabad
Vs.
.....Appellant
M/s Jindal Steel & Power Ltd.
....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TBJINDER SINGH DHINDSAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAINPresent:Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate for the appellant,
Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the respondent.
TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA J. (Oral)
Instant appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,1961 is directed against the order dated 15.11.2019 passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in SA No. 1033/Del/2019 pertaining toassessment year 2011-12.
Mr. Tajinder K. Joshi, learned Senior Standing counsel for theappellant at the very outset concedes that the issue raised in the appealwould be covered against the revenue in the light of Division Benchjudgment dated 25.04.2016 passed in ITA No.5 of 2016 titled as PrincipalCommissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon Vs. M/s Carrier Air Conditioningand Refrigeration Ltd. which has been further relied upon by anotherDivision Bench judgment dated 16.05.2019 in ITA No.78 of 2019 titled asThe Principal Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Gurgaon Vs. M/s MitsubishiElectric Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., Manesar, Gurgaon.
In view of the above, instant appeal is dismissed in terms ofjudgment dated 16.05.2019 passed by this Court in ITA No.78 of 2019,
(TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA)JUDGE
04.07.2022
shweta
(PANKAJ JAIN)JUDGE
SHWETAWhether reportable2022.07.07 10:44I attest to the accuracy andauthenticity of this document2022.07.07 10:44I attest to the accuracy andauthenticity of this document
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.