Case LawHigh Court › The Present 482 Cr.p.c. Application Has...

The Present 482 Cr.p.c. Application Has Been Filed Toquash The Summoning Order Dated 28.3.2019 As Well Asentire Proceedings In Complaint Case v. Ajay Kumar Agarwal), Under Section277 Of Income Tax Act, 1961 And 181 Ipc, Pending In Thecourt Of Special C.j.m., Varanasi

High Court 28 Jun 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
The Present 482 Cr.p.c. Application Has Been Filed Toquash The Summoning Order Dated 28.3.2019 As Well Asentire Proceedings In Complaint Case v. Ajay Kumar Agarwal), Under Section277 Of Income Tax Act, 1961 And 181 Ipc, Pending In Thecourt Of Special C.j.m., Varanasi
Date of order
28 Jun 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Present 482 Cr.p.c. Application Has Been Filed Toquash The Summoning Order Dated 28.3.2019 As Well Asentire Proceedings In Complaint Case v. Ajay Kumar Agarwal), Under Section277 Of Income Tax Act, 1961 And 181 Ipc, Pending In Thecourt Of Special C.j.m., Varanasi, the High Court (2019) decided the matter under Section 277 of the Income-tax Act.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23913 of 2019 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar AgarwalOpposite Party :- State Of U.P. And AnotherCounsel for Applicant :- Ashish Bansal,Shishir PrakashCounsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learnedA.G.A. for the State. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed toquash the summoning order dated 28.3.2019 as well asentire proceedings in Complaint Case No. 736 of 2019(Union of India Vs. Ajay Kumar Agarwal), under Section277 of Income Tax Act, 1961 and 181 IPC, pending in thecourt of Special C.J.M., Varanasi. Submission that from the perusal of entire complaint, noprima facie cognizable offence under Section 277 ofIncome Tax Act and Section 181 IPC is made out againstthe applicant. No false statement was given by theapplicant rather he sought time to bring on record thecorrect facts. The proceedings against the applicantamount to abuse of process of Court. In view of the above, the applicant is permitted to movedischarge application through counsel before the trialcourt within one month from today and the trial court shalldecide the same within a period of two months from thedate of filing of application alongwith certified copy of thisorder. Till the discharge application is decided, no coercivemeasures shall be taken against the applicant. With the aforesaid observations, this application isdisposed of. Order Date :- 28.6.2019Ruchi Agrahari
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan