Case Law › High Court › The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Inco...

The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Taxand Others v. Ghuge

High Court 20 Sep 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

20 Sep 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Taxand Others v. Ghuge, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

*1*nobwp8923a8931a9417o22 spk ordr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8923 OF 2022 ANDWRIT PETITION NO.8931 OF 2022AND WRIT PETITION NO.9417 OF 2022 SARITA MUKESH AGRAWALVERSUS THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND OTHERS … Shri A.N. Sikchi, Advocate for the petitioner.Shri Alok Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. ... CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ARUN R. PEDNEKER, JJ. DATE :- 30[th] September, 2022 Per Court :- 1.Not on the Board. Mentioned. 2.These are three motions for speaking to the minutes of the identical orders dated 20.09.2022 passed in these three petitions. 3.It is pointed out that in paragraph 7, line No.2 onpage No.5, the date “17.06.2021” has been inadvertently typed. Itshould be “26.07.2022”. *2*nobwp8923a8931a9417o22 spk ordr 4.In view of the above, these motions are allowed.Correction be, accordingly, carried out in the orders dated20.09.2022. Corrected copies be uploaded. kps(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.