The Principal Commissioner Of Income, Gurgaon v. M/S Sun Life India Service Centre Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon
High Court
13 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income, Gurgaon v. M/S Sun Life India Service Centre Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon
Date of order
13 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income, Gurgaon v. M/S Sun Life India Service Centre Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA-182-2017
Date of Decision: 13.11.2018
The Principal Commissioner of Income, Gurgaon
Versus
...Appellant.
M/s Sun Life India Service Centre Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon
...Respondent.
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL.
PRESENT: Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for
Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Suvinay Kumar Dash, Advocate for the respondent.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
1.Letter dated 3.10.2018 is taken on record.
2.Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the
tax effect involved is ` 15,49,915/-, he has instructions to withdraw thepresent appeal in view of Circular No.03/2018, dated 11[th] July, 2018, issuedby the Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi. However, he has prayedthat liberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of theappeal in case something survives therein.
3.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is,however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not betaken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legalissue as claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in anappropriate case.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
November 13, 2018
gbs
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)JUDGE
Whether Speaking/ReasonedWhether Reportable
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.