Case LawHigh Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1, Surat v. M/S. Airlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. ==========================================================

High Court 07 Nov 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1, Surat v. M/S. Airlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. ==========================================================
Date of order
07 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1, Surat v. M/S. Airlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. ==========================================================, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 1491 of2023 In F/TAX APPEAL NO. 17646 of 2023 ==========================================================THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1, SURAT VersusM/S. AIRLINK COMMUNICATIONS PVT. LTD. ========================================================== Appearance:MRS KALPANA K RAVAL(1046) for the Applicant(s) No. 1RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAVand HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MAUNA M. BHATT Date : 07/11/2023 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV) Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Considering the averments made in the application, the delay that has occurred in preferring the tax appeal ishereby condoned. Civil application is allowed,accordingly. (BIREN VAISHNAV, J) BIMAL (MAUNA M. BHATT,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan