The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Ankur Protein Industries Ltd
High Court
19 Aug 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Ankur Protein Industries Ltd
Date of order
19 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Ankur Protein Industries Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/CA/1860/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1860 of 2019In F/TAX APPEAL NO. 21265 of 2019
==========================================================
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 Versus
ANKUR PROTEIN INDUSTRIES LTD.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Applicant(s) No. 1MR MANISH J SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent No.1RULE NOT RECD BACK(63) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAand
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.C. RAO
Date : 19/08/2019 ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
Mr. Manish J. Shah, the learned counsel has appeared for the respondent – assessee.
This is an application at the instance of the Revenue for condonation of delay of 13 days in filing Tax Appeal.
Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having considered the averments made in this application, we are convinced that sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay of 13 days in filing the Tax Appeal. The delay is hereby condoned. This application is allowed. Rule is made absolute.
Notify the Tax Appeal now for admission.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
CHANDRESH
(A. C. RAO, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.