In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Adani Agro Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/CA/4164/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4164 of 2019
In F/TAX APPEAL NO. 38366 of 2019
==========================================================THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 VersusM/S ADANI AGRO PVT. LTD.
==========================================================Appearance:MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Applicant(s) No. 1RULE SERVED(64) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 10/02/2020
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
This is an application at the instance of the Revenue for condonation of delay of 494 days in filing Tax Appeal.
Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the Revenue and having considered the averments made in this application, we are convinced that sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay of 494 days in filing the Tax Appeal. The delay is hereby condoned. This application is allowed. Rule is made absolute.
The Tax Appeal shall now be notified for admission subject to removal of office objections, if any.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
CHANDRESH
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.