In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Shri Avtarsingh Khurana, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Tax Appeal is disposed of accordingly. [Akil Kureshi, J.] Prakash [B.N Karia, J.]
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 168 of 2016
With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 165 of 2016
==========================================================THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1VersusSHRI AVTARSINGH KHURANA
==========================================================
Appearance:MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA4[th] September 2018
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Learned advocate Ms. Mauna Bhatt, under instructions from the Department, sought permission to withdraw this appeal since the tax effect involved in this appeal is below the minimum threshold limit provided by CBDT in its Circular dated 11.07.2018 enabling the Department to prefer and maintain appeals before the High Court.
Permission is granted. Tax Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
[Akil Kureshi, J.]
Prakash
[B.N Karia, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.