Case LawHigh Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Sushilaben D Shah

High Court 10 Sep 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Sushilaben D Shah
Date of order
10 Sep 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Sushilaben D Shah, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1635 of 2020In R/TAX APPEAL NO. 270 of 2020 ========================================================== THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 VersusSUSHILABEN D SHAH ========================================================== Appearance:MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATHandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA Date : 10/09/2020 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) Having heard Ms. Bhatt, the learned senior counsel appearing for the Revenue and having gone through the averments made in this application, we are convinced that sufficient cause has been assigned by the applicant for condonation of delay of 78 days in preferring the appeal. The delay is, accordingly, condoned. The civil application stands disposed of. (VIKRAM NATH, CJ) Vahid (J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan