The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1Chennai-600 034 v. A S Cargo Movers Private Limitednew
High Court
15 Sep 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1Chennai-600 034 v. A S Cargo Movers Private Limitednew
Date of order
15 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1Chennai-600 034 v. A S Cargo Movers Private Limitednew, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
CMP No.20256 of 2025 in TCA SR No.104346 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
C.M.P.No.20256 of 2025in T.C.A. SR No.104346 of 2025
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 1Chennai-600 034
Applicant
Vs
A S Cargo Movers Private LimitedNew No.173, Old No.103, 9[th] FloorB-Block, Navins PresidumNelson Manickam Road, AminjikaraiChennai-600 029
Respondent
For Applicant:
Mr.S.Abubacker Sidhic
Jr. Standing Counsel
For Respondent:
Mr.P.Arumugam
___________
Page 1 of 2
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 32 days in filing the appeal.
3. Taking into consideration the short period of delay and the cause shown, we are inclined to condone the delay.
4. Application for condonation of delay is allowed.
List the appeal for orders on admission.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 15.09.2025
bbr
___________
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue