The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1Chennai v. M/S. Rane Brake Lining Ltd
High Court
03 Jul 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1Chennai v. M/S. Rane Brake Lining Ltd
Date of order
03 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1Chennai v. M/S. Rane Brake Lining Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.07.2025
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE
ANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
T.C.A.No.288 of 2022
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 1Chennai...Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Rane Brake Lining Ltd.No.132, Cathedral RoadGopalapuram, Chennai 600 086PAN: AADCR7688H
..Respondent
Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 25.02.2022 passed in ITA No.2834/CHNY/2019 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai.
For Appellant
:Mrs.V.Pushpa Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent
:Mr.R.Venkat NarayananFor M/s. Subbaraya Aiyar,Padmanabhan, Ramamani
__________
Page 1 of 4
JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Ms.Pushpa states that the monetary limit involved in this appeal is below the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No.05/2024 dated 15.03.2024 and Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India. Counsel says that she has instructions, therefore, to withdraw the appeal.
2. Counsel also states that the withdrawal is only due to the monetary limit and without conceding the stand of the Department.
3. Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J.) 03.07.2025
__________
Page 2 of 4
Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nokpl
To
1. The Assistant Registrar
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches, Chennai. Chennai Benches, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Chennai. Chennai.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax LTU-2 Chennai. Chennai.
__________
Page 3 of 4
__________Page 4 of 4
T.C.A.No.288 of 2022
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND SUNDER MOHAN,J.(kpl)
T.C.A.No.288 of 2022
03.07.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.