Case LawHigh Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Ngpur v. M/S. Sharda Ispat Limited Nagpur

High Court 26 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Ngpur v. M/S. Sharda Ispat Limited Nagpur
Date of order
26 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Ngpur v. M/S. Sharda Ispat Limited Nagpur, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: 3) The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
2025:BHC-NAG:9846-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 05 OF 2024 ( The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 Ngpur vs. M/s. Sharda Ispat Limited Nagpur ) Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or the directions, and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's order Mr. Anand Parchure with Mr.B.N.Mohta, Advocates for appellant. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, JJ. SEPTEMBER 26, 2025 1)Learned counsel for the appellant has filed pursis dated 11/09/2025, stating therein that the appellant does not want to prosecute the appeal and accordingly seeks permission to withdraw the same with a request to refund the Court fees as per Rules. 2) Permission is granted. 3) The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Court fees shall be refunded, in accordance with the Rules. ( JUDGE ) ( JUDGE )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan