In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Honourable Mr. Justice Bhargav D. Karia, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal under Section 260A, Section 80IB of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 2.The Revenue has proposed the following questions as substantial questions of law involved in this appeal:- “2(A) Whether the Appellate Tribunal had erred in law and on facts in upholding the order of the CIT(A) deleting the disallowance of Rs.71,99,242/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of...
Decision: For the reasons recorded by us today while dismissing the Tax Appeal No.734 of 2019, this Tax Appeal also fails and is hereby dismissed. (J
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 814 of 2019
==========================================================
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 VersusGANESH HOUSING CORPORATION LTD. ==========================================================Appearance:MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 for the Opponent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 13/01/2020
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
1.This Tax Appeal is filed under Section 260A of the Income Act, 1961 (for short the “Act”) at the instance of Revenue and it is directed against the order dated 15.05.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'B', Ahmedabad in ITA No.452/Ahd/2014 for the assessment year 2009-2010.
2.The Revenue has proposed the following questions as substantial questions of law involved in this appeal:-
“2(A) Whether the Appellate Tribunal had erred in law and on facts in upholding the order of the CIT(A) deleting the disallowance of Rs.71,99,242/- made by the Assessing Officer on
account of deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Act without appreciating the fact that the Assessing Officer had established with proven evidences that the assessee did not fulfill the requisite conditions for claiming deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Act?
(B) Whether Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in upholding the order of the CIT(A) deleting the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer on account of proportionate interest expense of Rs.8,67,12,000/- without appreciating fact that the assessee company has incurred substantial interest expenses while giving interest free loans?”
3. For the reasons recorded by us today while dismissing the Tax Appeal No.734 of 2019, this Tax Appeal also fails and is hereby dismissed.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
GIRISH
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.