Case Law › High Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-27 v. Darshak Bharat Shah

High Court 01 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

01 Aug 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-27 v. Darshak Bharat Shah, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

NIKITAYOGESHGADGILDigitally signed byNIKITA YOGESHGADGILDate: 2022.08.0118:36:21 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 407 OF 2021 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-27VersusDarshak Bharat Shah … Appellant … Respondent ****** Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellant. ****** CORAM: DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : 1[st] AUGUST, 2022 P.C. :- 1.Learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the Respondenthas opted for the VSV Scheme and the matter has been settled. Heseeks leave to withdraw the Appeal. Leave granted. Income TaxAppeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 2.Refund of Court fees as per rules. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR,J.) Nikita Gadgil 1/1

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.