Case LawHigh Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Venugopalan Parandhamanno

High Court 29 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Venugopalan Parandhamanno
Date of order
29 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Venugopalan Parandhamanno, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Recording the aforesaid submission, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawn leaving the questions of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

T.C.A.No.288 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29.11.2024 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTHand THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN T.C.A.No.288 of 2024 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3,Non-Corporate Circle 10 (1),121, Nungambakkam High Road,Chennai – 600 034... Appellant vs Shri Venugopalan ParandhamanNo.9, Costal Road,Besant Nagar,Chennai – 600 090.PAN : .. Respondent Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench, dated 18.12.2023 in ITA No.1173/Chny/2023. For Appellant :Mr.J.NarayanaswamySenior Standing Counsel JUDGMENT (Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant/Department would submit that the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue this appeal qua assessment year 2019 - 20 and seeks withdrawal of the same on account of the low tax effect per Circular bearing No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024. 2. Incidentally, we find that substantial question of law No.4 states as follows: 4. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT has filed to note that any order nullifying an unambiguous statutory rule makes it lose its legal force and is therefore covered within the exceptional clause (a) of para 10 of CBDT's Circular 3/2018 viz. “Constitutional validity of the provisions of an Act or Rule is under challenge”? 3. However, as acceded to by Mr.Narayanasamy and as apparent from a reading of the impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, there was no challenge to any Act or Rule before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and hence this question of law appears to be misconceived. T.C.A.No.288 of 2024 4. Recording the aforesaid submission, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawn leaving the questions of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter. No costs. Index:Yes/NoSpeaking OrderNeutral Citation:Yessl [A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 29.11.2024 T.C.A.No.288 of 2024 DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J.and G. ARUL MURUGAN.,J. Sl T.C.A.No.288 of 2024 29.11.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan