The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 v. Sterling Abrasives Ltd
High Court
05 May 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 v. Sterling Abrasives Ltd
Date of order
05 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 v. Sterling Abrasives Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: No question of law arises.Tax Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL No. 450 of 2018
=============================================================
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4
VersusSTERLING ABRASIVES LTD
=============================================================
Appearance :Mr M.R BHATT, Sr Advocate with Mrs M.M BHATT, Advocate for the PETITIONER for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1=============================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA5[th] May 2018
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad [“Tribunal” for short] dated 13[th] November 2017, raising the following question for our consideration :
“Whether the Tribunal is correct in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of foreign travel expenses of RS. 35,15,07/= ?”
The issue pertains to disallowance of the expenditure on
foreign travel incurred by the assessee. CIT [A] having
confirmed the disallowance, the issue reached the Tribunal. The Tribunal, by the impugned judgment, noted that the assessee-company had submitted copy of email correspondence with foreign parties in respect of foreign travel. Relying on such materials and the deletion of disallowances in the earlier years, the Tribunal ruled in favour of the assessee.
Entire issue is factual in nature. No question of law arises.Tax Appeal is dismissed.
Prakash
[Akil Kureshi, J.][B.N Karia, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.