Case Law › High Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4Chennai 600 034 v. M/S. Ashok Leyland Limited[Successor Of M/S. Ashok Leyland Project Services Ltd.]

High Court 03 Jul 2025 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · hc_cis_mas

Parties

Date of order

03 Jul 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4Chennai 600 034 v. M/S. Ashok Leyland Limited[Successor Of M/S. Ashok Leyland Project Services Ltd.], the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 260A case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

T.C.A.No.154 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.07.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE ANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN T.C.A.No.154 of 2024 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4Chennai 600 034...Appellant Vs. M/s. Ashok Leyland Limited[Successor of M/s. Ashok Leyland Project Services Ltd.]No.1, Sardar Patel RoadGuindy, Chennai 600 032.PAN: .. ..Respondent Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 08.09.2022 passed in Cross Objection No.02/CHNY/2019 in ITA No.2972/CHNY/2018 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'C' Bench, Chennai. For Appellant :Mrs.V.Pushpa Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent :Mr.R.Venkat NarayananFor M/s. Subbaraya Aiyar,Padmanabhan & Ramamani __________ Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Ms.Pushpa states that the monetary limit involved in this appeal is below the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No.05/2024 dated 15.03.2024 and Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India. Counsel says that she has instructions, therefore, to withdraw the appeal. 2. Counsel also states that the withdrawal is only due to the monetary limit and without conceding the stand of the Department. 3. Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J.) 03.07.2025 __________ Page 2 of 4 Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nokpl To 1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches, Chennai. Chennai Benches, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Chennai. Chennai. __________ Page 3 of 4 T.C.A.No.154 of 2024 __________Page 4 of 4 T.C.A.No.154 of 2024 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND SUNDER MOHAN,J.(kpl) T.C.A.No.154 of 2024 03.07.2025

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.