The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. Force Motors Limited
High Court
01 Apr 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. Force Motors Limited
Date of order
01 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. Force Motors Limited, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
1 / 2 12-ITXA-58-17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.58 OF 2017WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.77 OF 2017
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.670 OF 2017WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.717 OF 2017
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5
.... Appellant
versus
Force Motors Limited... Respondent
…....
Mr.Tejveer Singh, Advocate for Appellant.Mr.Tejveer Singh, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr.Rohan Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent.Mr.Rohan Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.DATE: 01[st] APRIL, 2019.
P.C. :
1. These Appeal under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 (“the Act” for short) have been filed challenging theorder passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2 / 2 12-ITXA-58-17.odt
2.The learned Counsel appearing in support of theAppeals, states that he has been instructed to withdraw theseAppeals. This is for the reason that the tax effect involved inthese Appeals is less than the threshold limit of Rs.50 Lacs asprovided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018.
3.In view of the above submission, the Appeals aredismissed as not pressed.
4.Refund of court fees as per rules.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.