The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 … v. Van Oord India Pvt. Ltd. …

Urmila IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 822 OF 2019 ININCOME TAX APPEAL ST. NO. 3028 OF 2017 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5 … ApplicantVs.Van Oord India Pvt. Ltd.… Respondent … Respondent Mr. Nirmal C. Mohanty for the Applicant. Ms.Jasmine A. i/b PDS Legal, for Respondent. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M. S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 19 DECEMBER, 2019. P. C. :.Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2.We have perused affidavit in support of Notice of Motion.Sufficient cause is made out by the Applicant to condone the delay infiling the Notice of Motion and for restoration of the Appeal. Delay infiling the Notice of Motion is condoned. Subject to removal of alloffice objections within a period of eight weeks from today, the orderpassed by the Prothonotary & Senior Master dated 16 November 2018is set aside. If office objections are not removed within eight weeksfrom today, the earlier order will stand revived. 1/2 DigitallyUrmilasigned byUrmila P. IngleP.Date:2019.12.20Ingle18:06:52+0530 3.The contention of the Respondent that Appeal has becomeinfructuous will be considered as and when the Appeal is taken up forhearing. 4.Notice of Motion is accordingly allowed. [M. S. KARNIK, J.] [NITIN JAMDAR, J.] 2/2