Case LawHigh Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bathinda v. Hpcl Mittal Energy Ltd

High Court 14 Feb 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bathinda v. Hpcl Mittal Energy Ltd
Date of order
14 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bathinda v. Hpcl Mittal Energy Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH --ITA4702017 (O&M)-Date of decision: 14.02.2018 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bathinda Versus ...Appellant HPCL Mittal Energy Ltd. ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present:- Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate, for the appellant. * * * * S.J. VAZIFDAR, C.J. (ORAL) This is an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 25.01.2017 extending a stay in the appeal filed by the respondent/assessee. The matter pertains to the assessment year 2008-2009. 2. The main grievance is that although the stay has been continued from time to time, the matter itself has not been decided by the Tribunal. Mr. Goyal invites our attention to an order dated 14.09.2015 disposing of the appellant’s applications for vacating the stay on the ground that the appeal had been heard and that the order was “under pronouncement”. It appears that there was a difference of opinion between the members of the Tribunal and the matter, therefore, had to be referred to a third Mr. Goyal’s grievance is that the third member has not even been nominated since the pronouncement of the order. However, the appellant has also not made any application to the Tribunal for the same. We have no doubt that if the attention of the member. Tribunal is invited to the facts, the President of the Tribunal will forthwith nominate the third member, if not already nominated and request him to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible in view of the issue involved as well as in view of the amount involved. 3. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. (S.J. VAZIFDAR) CHIEF JUSTICE (AVNEESH JHINGAN) JUDGE 14.02.2018 Amodh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan