The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax- (Central) – 4 v. In The Light Of Circular
High Court
11 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax- (Central) – 4 v. In The Light Of Circular
Date of order
11 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax- (Central) – 4 v. In The Light Of Circular, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
920-itxa-1863.16.doc
Digitally signedby BIPININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBIPINDHARMENDERDHARMENDERPRITHIANIPRITHIANIDate:ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION2022.08.1217:20:40 +0530BIPINDHARMENDERDHARMENDERPRITHIANIPRITHIANIDate:ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION2022.08.1217:20:40 +0530
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1863 OF 2016
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax- (Central) – 4
…Appellant
Versus
M/s. Triumph International Finance India Ltd.…Respondent
******
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr. Anil K. Jasani for the Respondent.
******
CORAM: DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : 11[th] AUGUST, 2022
P.C. :-
.Learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the tax effect in thepresent Appeal is below the limit stipulated in terms of Circular No. 17of 2019 dated 8[th] August, 2019. It is stated that no instructions havebeen received from the Department to withdraw the present Appeal.
2.In the light of Circular No. 17 of 2019, the Appeal is disposed ofas involving low tax effect.
3.However, we observe that in case, the Revenue finds for somereason that the Appeal was not supposed to have been withdrawn in thelight of the Circular, it would be open to the Revenue to file anapplication/preceipe seeking restoration of the Appeal to be decided onits own merits. Refund of Court-fees as per rules.
[ABHAY AHUJA, J.]
[DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.