The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ahmedabad v. Lavjibhai Swarupchand Mehta
High Court
22 Oct 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ahmedabad v. Lavjibhai Swarupchand Mehta
Date of order
22 Oct 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Ahmedabad v. Lavjibhai Swarupchand Mehta, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13024 of 2020
==========================================================
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL),AHMEDABAD VersusLAVJIBHAI SWARUPCHAND MEHTA
==========================================================
Appearance:MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATHandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
Date : 22/10/2020
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH)
We have heard Ms. Mauna Bhatt, learned Senior
Standing Counsel appearing for the petitioner.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal rejected theapplication filed by the Department under Section 254(2)of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the finding that the samewas beyond prescribed period of limitation, i.e. beyond sixmonths from the end of the month in which the order waspassed.
Ms. Bhatt has not been able to show that theapplication was within time and not beyond the time.
In that view of the matter, we do not find anyinfirmity in the order passed by the Tribunal. The petitionlacks merit and is accordingly dismissed.
(VIKRAM NATH, CJ)
A. B. VAGHELA/A.M.PIRZADA
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.