Case LawHigh Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Bengaluru v. Goa Coastal Resorts And Recreation Pvt. Ltd

High Court 11 Nov 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Bengaluru v. Goa Coastal Resorts And Recreation Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
11 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Bengaluru v. Goa Coastal Resorts And Recreation Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA TAX APPEAL NO. 24 OF 2019 THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), BENGALURU., Versus ... Appellant GOA COASTAL RESORTS AND RECREATION PVT. LTD., ... Respondent Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant. Mr. P. Rao, Advocate for the Respondent. -Coram:M. S. SONAK & SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR, JJ. -Date:3rd February, 2020 P.C. Mentioned for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 11th November, 2019 since, several inadvertent andtypographical errors appear to have cropped up in the said order. 2. In para 3, in line 6, the word "He" to be substituted by theword "She". 3. In para 3, in line 9, the word "be" to be deleted and theword "arises" be substituted with the word "arise". 4. In line 10 of para 3 the word "the" before the word deletionto be substituted with the word "to". 5. In para 5, in line 7, the word "petition" to be substitutedwith the word "satisfaction". 6. In para 5, in line 9, the word "petitioner" to be substitutedwith the word "assessee". 7. In para 6, 4th line from bottom the word "of" to besubstituted with the word "off". 8. In para 7, in line 2, the word "relevant" to be substitutedwith the word "inapplicable". 9. In para 7, in line 5 the words "are" and "by" to besubstituted with the words "is" and "with" respectively. 10. In para 7, in line 7, the word "warrant" to be substitutedwith the word "warrants". 11. In para 8, in line 3, the word "is" before the worddefective is to be deleted. 12. The aforesaid corrections to be carried out in the originalorder as well as in the order uploaded on the website. 13. The motion of speaking to the minutes is disposed of. at* SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR, J.M. S. SONAK, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan