Case LawHigh Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Rajasthan,4[Th] Floor, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur v. M/S. Sums Exim Pvt. Ltd., A

High Court 07 Mar 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Rajasthan,4[Th] Floor, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur v. M/S. Sums Exim Pvt. Ltd., A
Date of order
07 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Rajasthan,4[Th] Floor, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur v. M/S. Sums Exim Pvt. Ltd., A, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal under Section 5 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Misc. Application No.2241/2024 In D.B. Civil Restoration Application No.1128/2024 The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Rajasthan,4[th] Floor, LIC Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur ----Applicant Versus M/s. Sums Exim Pvt. Ltd., A-1, 1[st] Floor, Yamuna Path, SurajNagar (West), Jaipur (PAN: ) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth BapnaFor Respondent(s): HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR 07/03/2025 Order Heard on application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Actfor condonation of delay. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same isallowed and delay is condoned. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J(INDERJEET SINGH),J Arun/44
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan