The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Central), Rajasthan,4Th Floor, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur v. M/S Sm Developers, A
High Court
09 Apr 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Central), Rajasthan,4Th Floor, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur v. M/S Sm Developers, A
Date of order
09 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Central), Rajasthan,4Th Floor, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur v. M/S Sm Developers, A, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal under Section 5 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Misc. Application No.2310/2024
In
D.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 1137/2024
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Central), Rajasthan,4Th Floor, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Ambedkar Circle,Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
M/s Sm Developers, A-1, 1St Floor, Yamuna Path, Suraj Nagar(West), Jaipur (Pan Abefs0165R)
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Siddharth Bapna For Respondent(s):
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
09/04/2025
Order
Heard on the application under Section 5 of the LimitationAct for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same isallowed. The delay in filing the restoration application is herebycondoned.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra/90
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.