Case Law › High Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Central), Rajasthan,Room v. Vijay Granimarmo Private Limited, Naya Ghar Gulab Bari, Ajmer(Pan

High Court 30 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

30 Sep 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Central), Rajasthan,Room v. Vijay Granimarmo Private Limited, Naya Ghar Gulab Bari, Ajmer(Pan, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 136/2024 The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Central), Rajasthan,Room No. 402, 4Th Floor, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road,Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur-302005. ----Appellant Versus Vijay Granimarmo Private Limited, Naya Ghar Gulab Bari, Ajmer(Pan/gir No.-Aagcv1986R). ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr.Meyhul Mittal forMr.Siddharth Bapna HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 30/09/2024 1.The tax effect in appeal is below Rupees Two Crores, in viewof the circular of Central Board of Direct Taxes dated 17.09.2024,learned counsel for appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. 2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 3.The formulated substantial question of law is kept open. 6.The Department shall be at liberty to move an application for revival in case the matter is not covered under the circular. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika Chugh/Chandan/6

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.