The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central),Ahmedabad v. Alkaben Pravinchandra Kotak
High Court
03 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central),Ahmedabad v. Alkaben Pravinchandra Kotak
Date of order
03 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central),Ahmedabad v. Alkaben Pravinchandra Kotak, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1878 of 2021
In R/TAX APPEAL NO. 3 of 2022
=============================================THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL),AHMEDABAD Versus
ALKABEN PRAVINCHANDRA KOTAK
=============================================
Appearance:
M R BHATT & CO.(5953) for the Applicant(s) No. 1MR RUTUL P DESAI(6498) for the Respondent(s) No. 1=============================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAandHONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 03/01/2022ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
1.We have heard Mr. M.R. Bhatt, the learned SeniorCounsel appearing for the applicant-Revenue and Mr. Manish J.Shah, the learned counsel appearing for the opponent –assessee.
2.In view of the averments made in the application, we areconvinced with the sufficient cause assigned for condonation ofdelay of 17 days in filing the Tax Appeal.
3.The delay is accordingly condoned. The civil applicationstands disposed of.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.