The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central),Ahmedabad v. Rajendra J Keshwani Huf
High Court
26 Oct 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central),Ahmedabad v. Rajendra J Keshwani Huf
Date of order
26 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central),Ahmedabad v. Rajendra J Keshwani Huf, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1440 of 2021
In F/TAX APPEAL NO. 12479 of 2021
==========================================================
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL),AHMEDABAD
Versus
RAJENDRA J KESHWANI HUF
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MR BHATT, SR. ADV. with MR KARAN SANGHANI, ADV. for M R BHATT & CO.(5953) for the Applicant(s) No. 1RULE SERVED(64) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANIandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Date : 26/10/2021
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI)
1.Present application under section 5 of the
Limitation Act is preferred by the applicant
seeking condonation of delay of 17 days inpreferring the appeal.preferring the appeal.
2.Considering the contents of the application
and the averments set out by the learned
advocate for the appellant, the minuscule
delay of 17 days occurred in preferring
appeal is condoned.
3.Application is allowed. Disposed of
accordingly.
(MS. SONIA GOKANI, J)
SUDHIR
(HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.