The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Voith Paper Fabrics India Ltd
High Court
22 Oct 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Voith Paper Fabrics India Ltd
Date of order
22 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Voith Paper Fabrics India Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA-16-2019 (O&M)
a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHAN DIGAR
118
ITA-16-2019 (O&M)Date of decision °:22.10.201
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad ...... Appellant
Versus
M/s Voith Paper Fabrics India Ltd....... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JIUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR.JUSTICEHARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present :Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for|Mr. T.K.Joshi, Senior Standing Counselfor the appellant.
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
...
1,CMF718FCIIm2019
For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowedand delay of 72 days in refiling the appeal is condoned.
2.CMF720FCITm2019
For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowedand delay of 2 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
3)Main case
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the taxeffect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in Circular No.3of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes,further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 read withLetter No.F.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated 20.08.2019, he _ hainstructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that liberty
ITA-16-2019 (O&M)
be granted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of theappeal, in case something survives therein.
5Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4)Since the main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, the pending
C.M, if any also stands disposed of.
(AJAY TEWARIT
JUDGE
22.10.2019anuradha
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable |
Yes/No
Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.