The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur v. Satyanarayan Raju
High Court
07 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur v. Satyanarayan Raju
Date of order
07 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jamshedpur v. Satyanarayan Raju, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tax Appeal No. 33 of 2019
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur ---
Appellant
Versus
Satyanarayan Raju
---
Respondent
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar SinghHon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
Through: Video Conferencing
---
For the Appellant : Mr. Rahul Lamba, Advocdate For the Respondent : Ms. Aakansha Mittal, Advocate
: Ms. Aakansha Mittal, Advocate
----
08/07.03.2022
Learned counsel for the appellant-Income Tax Department, Mr. Rahul Lamba seeks permission to withdraw this appeal on instruction, however, with liberty to prefer review application before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ranchi Bench, Ranchi.
Learned counsel for the respondent does not object to the prayer.
Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. It is up to the appellant to seek review of the impugned order, if permissible in law.
I.A No. 4221 of 2021 stands closed.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J)
jk/
(Deepak Roshan,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.