The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Ajit Ramakant Phatarpekar
High Court
20 Feb 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Ajit Ramakant Phatarpekar
Date of order
20 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Ajit Ramakant Phatarpekar, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 569 OF 2017IN
TAX APPEAL NO. 56 OF 2016
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI.,
Versus
... Applicant
AJIT RAMAKANT PHATARPEKAR.,
... Respondent
Ms. P. Bhandari, Additional Government Advocate h/f. Ms. A.Razaq, Government Advocate for the Applicant.Mr. H.D. Naik, Advocate for the Respondent.
-Coram:N. M. JAMDAR &
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
-Date:20th February 2018
P.C.:
The application is filed for bringing the legal heirs of thedeceased Respondent on record. The learned Counsel appears onbehalf of the proposed heirs.
2. Perused the application. The application is allowed in terms
of prayer clause (a).
3. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks
from today.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
mv
N. M. JAMDAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue