Case Law › High Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Beiersdorf India Pvt. Ltd

High Court 20 Feb 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

20 Feb 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Beiersdorf India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 27 OF 2018IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 1091 OF 2017 THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI., Versus ... Applicant BEIERSDORF INDIA PVT. LTD., ... Respondent None for the Applicant. -Coram:N. M. JAMDAR & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ. -Date:20th February 2018 P.C. Perused the application. The delay in filing the TaxAppeal is of One day. Notice was issued and the registry hasendorsed that it has been served. The cause made having beenfound sufficient, the Civil Application is allowed in terms ofprayer clause (a). NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J. at* N. M. JAMDAR, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.