The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Infrastructure Logistics Pvt. Ltd
High Court
31 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Infrastructure Logistics Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
31 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Infrastructure Logistics Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 61 OF 2017
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI.,
Versus
... Appellant
INFRASTRUCTURE LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.,
... Respondent
Ms. Susan Linhares, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Vinita Vishram Palyekar, Advocate for the respondent.
-Coram:SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
-Date:31st January 2018
P.C.
The learned counsel for the appellant on instructions
received by her vide letter dated 19th January, 2018, which istaken on record and marked as 'X' for identification, seeks leaveto withdraw this appeal as the financial implications are less thanRs.20 lakhs. Prayer is accepted.
2. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
at*
SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue