The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. M/S. Mohit Ispat Ltd.,(In Short Mil
High Court
07 Jul 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. M/S. Mohit Ispat Ltd.,(In Short Mil
Date of order
07 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. M/S. Mohit Ispat Ltd.,(In Short Mil, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty asstated herein above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2016
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI.
VersusM/S. MOHIT ISPAT LTD.,(IN SHORT MIL)
... Appellant
... Respondent
Ms. Asha A. Desai, Advocate for the appellant.Mr. Parag S. Rao, Advocate for the respondent.
-Coram:F. M. REIS &NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.-Date:7th July, 2016
P.C.:
During the course of hearing of the above appeal, Mr. P.Rao, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent has pointed outthat the appeal itself is not maintainable, as it does not meet therequisite tax effect due, to enable the appellant to file the presentappeal in terms of the Circular dated 10/07/2014.
2. Ms. Asha Desai, learned Counsel appearing for theappellant, however, submits that the appellant has filed an applicationbeing Misc. Application No.21/PAN/2015 before the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Panaji for recall/review of the impugned order. The learned Counsel further points out that based on the decision insuch review application, the appellant would be able to satisfy therequirement of such Circular. The learned Counsel further points out
that such an application filed before the ITAT has not yet beendisposed of.
3. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case,considering that it is undisputed that the tax effect as it stands today,would not entitle the appellants to maintain the appeal in view of thesaid Circular, nevertheless, we find it appropriate to dispose of theabove appeal with liberty to the appellant to file a fresh appeal,challenging the impugned order dated 25/11/2014 of the ITAT aftera decision on the Misc. Application No.21/PAN/2015 filed by theappellant before the learned ITAT. The learned Tribunal is,accordingly, directed to dispose of such application as expeditiouslyas possible.
4. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty asstated herein above. All contentions of the parties, on merits, are leftopen.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
ssm.
F. M. REIS, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.