The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. M/S. Paradise Inland Shipping Pvt. Ltd
High Court
29 Mar 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. M/S. Paradise Inland Shipping Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
29 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. M/S. Paradise Inland Shipping Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 268 OF 2017INTAX APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2016
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI., VersusM/S. PARADISE INLAND SHIPPING PVT. LTD.,
... Applicant
... Respondent
Shri Jitendra P. Supekar, Advocate for the Applicant.Ms. Susan Linhares, Junior Standing Counsel for theRespondent.
-Coram:F. M. REIS &
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
-Date:
29th March, 2017
P.C.:
This is an application to add additional documents whichwere part of the record before the Income Tax AppellateTribunal. The learned Counsel appearing for the applicant doesnot dispute the said contention. Hence, the documents areallowed to be placed on record. The issue of the relevance orotherwise of the said documents is left open.
2. Application stands disposed off.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
NH
F. M. REIS, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue