The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. M/S. Trimurti Exports
High Court
07 Mar 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. M/S. Trimurti Exports
Date of order
07 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. M/S. Trimurti Exports, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2017INSTAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 141 OF 2016
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI., Versus
M/S. TRIMURTI EXPORTS.,
... Applicant
... Respondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Gautami Kakodkar, Advocate for the Respondent.
-Coram:ANOOP V. MOHTA &
C. V. BHADANG, JJ.
-Date:
7th March, 2017
ORDER:
The applicant has taken up this application for condonation of6 days delay in filing the present appeal as substantial questionof law is stated to be involved. Considering the averments andas cause is shown, the application is allowed. The delay iscondoned accordingly. No costs.
2. Appeal to be listed for admission on 29.03.2017.
EV
C. V. BHADANG, J.
ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue