In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. M/S.shree Par Fragrance Private Ltd, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEETIN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAAPPELLATE SIDE
TAX APPEAL NO. 74 OF 2015
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI. VersusM/S.SHREE PAR FRAGRANCE PRIVATE LTD.,
... Appellant.
... Respondent
Ms. S. M. Desai, Advocate holding for Ms. Asha A. Desai, Advocatefor the appellant.Ms. Ninotksa P. Advocate for the respondent.
REGISTRAR'S ORDER
.
Application dated 27.01.2016 alongwith Tax Appeal No. 74/2015be forwarded to the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay for appropriateorders by the Hon'ble Chief Justice in view of the Order dated08.12.2015 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Courtof Bombay at Goa.
Learned Counsel for the other side has given no objection fortransfer/clubbing of the Tax Appeal No. 74/2015 with Income TaxAppeal No. 1325 of 2012 pending at Principal Seat.Date: 25th February, 2016( P. M. Shinde )
( P. M. Shinde )Deputy Registrar
ms
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue