Case Law › High Court › The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Shri. Soumit Ranjan Jena

High Court 07 Aug 2017 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

07 Aug 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Shri. Soumit Ranjan Jena, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 599 OF 2017INTAX APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2017 THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI., VersusSHRI. SOUMIT RANJAN JENA., ... Applicant ... Respondent Ms. Susan Linhares, Advocate for the applicant. -Coram:F. M. REIS &NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.-Date:7th August, 2017 P.C. It is pointed out by Ms. S. Linhares, the learned Counselappearing for the applicant, that the appeal has not been admittednor notice issued to respondents, hence, leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out within one week. Application disposed. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J. msr F. M. REIS, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.