In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. The Azmane Urban Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 401 OF 2017IN
STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 2104 OF 2016
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI.
Versus
... Applicant
THE AZMANE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.
... Respondent
Ms. S. Linhares, Jr. Standing Counsel for the Applicant.
-Coram:N. M. JAMDAR &-Date:21st November 2017
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
P.C.:
Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. The Respondentsare served. None appears for the Respondents.
2. Perused the application. Sufficient cause is made out tocondone the delay of 3 days. Misc. Civil Application is allowed.3. Place the appeal on board on 12 December 2017.
4. All office objections to be removed before the next date.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
mv
N. M. JAMDAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue