The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. The Sahakar Urban Credit Coopertative Society Ltd
High Court
28 Mar 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. The Sahakar Urban Credit Coopertative Society Ltd
Date of order
28 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. The Sahakar Urban Credit Coopertative Society Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Tax Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as tocosts.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 17 OF 2018
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI.,
Versus
... Appellant
THE SAHAKAR URBAN CREDIT COOPERTATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,
... Respondent
Ms. T. Ferreira, Advocate holding for Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq,Standing Counsel for the appellant.Mr. Gaurang D. Panandiker, Advocate for respondent.
-Coram:R. D. DHANUKA &
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.
-Date:28th March 2019
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant tenders acopy of the letter dated 24.10.2018 addressed by Income TaxOfficer(HQ)-2 to the learned Standing Counsel for the appellantinstructing the learned Standing Counsel to withdraw the TaxAppeal No.17 of 2018 in accordance with paragraph 4 of theCircular No.03/2018 dated 11.7.2018 in view of the Tax effectbeing below Rs.50,00,000/-. Letter is taken on record.
2. Tax Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as tocosts.
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
R. D. DHANUKA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.