The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji. V/S v. M. Salgaoncar And Bro. Pvt. Ltd
High Court
23 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji. V/S v. M. Salgaoncar And Bro. Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
23 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji. V/S v. M. Salgaoncar And Bro. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1 TXA-55-10 & Ors. dtd. 23.09.2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NOS. 55/2010, 17/2016, 100/2017 AND
TAX APPEAL No. 137/2017.
TAX APPEAL No. 55/2010
The Commissionerof Income Tax, Panaji. V/s.Zuari Maroc PhosphatesPrivate Limited.
.... Appellant
.... Respondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
Ms. Diksha Faterpekar, Advocate for the Respondent.
WITHTAX APPEAL NO.17/2016
The Principal Commissionerof Income Tax, Panaji. V/s.V. M. Salgaoncar And Bro. Pvt. Ltd.,
.... Appellant
.... Respondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. Ryan Da Piedade Menezes alongwith Ms. Neha Shirodkar, Advocates for the Respondent.
WITH
TAX APPEAL NO.100/2017
The Principal Commissionerof Income Tax, Panaji. .... Appellant V/s.Gil Oswald Ribeiro. .... Respondent
.... Respondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
2 TXA-55-10 & Ors. dtd. 23.09.2019
WITH
TAX APPEAL NO.137/2017
The Principal Commissioner
of Income Tax, Panaji. .... Appellant
V/s.
Deendayal Nagar Sahakari
Pathsaunstha Maryadit
.... Respondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Mr. Abhishek Sawant, Advocate for the Respondent.
Coram : M. S. SONAK &
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
Date : 23[rd] September, 2019.
P.C.:
At the request of Ms. Razaq, learned Standing Counsel
for the Income Tax Department, we permit the withdrawal of theseappeals, since the same are covered under the instructions containedin CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019.
2.
Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.
NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J. M. S. SONAK, J.
msr.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue