The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Salem v. M/S.s 4091 Mallasamudram Paccs
High Court
02 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Salem v. M/S.s 4091 Mallasamudram Paccs
Date of order
02 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Salem v. M/S.s 4091 Mallasamudram Paccs, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial question of law raised is leftopen.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
In the High Court of Judicature at MadrasDated : 02.1.2019
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAMand The Honourable Mr.Justice N.SATHISH KUMAR
Tax Case Appeal No.122 of 2018
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Salem ...Appellant / Appellant
Vs
M/s.S 4091 Mallasamudram PACCS
Ltd., Namakkal District-637503....Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 30.1.2017 in ITA No.3257/Mds/2016 on thefile of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'D' Bench forthe assessment year 2013-14 against the order dated 30.08.2016in ITA No.255/15-16 on the file of the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals), Salem against the order dated 30.10.2015 inPAN/GIR No.AABAN1134E on the file of the Income Tax Officer,Ward 5, Namakkal.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan, SSC
For Respondent :Ms.S.Surya Devi
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,JHeard the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant.
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue infavour of the assessee. The Revenue has filed this appeal byraising the following substantial question of law :
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
“Whether the Appellate Tribunal isright in allowing deduction under Section80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act to theassessee society, when the assesseecooperative society is engaged in financebusiness and cannot be termed as acooperative society ?”
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw this appeal on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial question of law raised is leftopen. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limitfixed in the said circular under exceptional clauses mentionedin the circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make amention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard anddecided on merits. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To1)The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench.2)The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Salem.
3)The Income Tax Officer, Ward 5, Namakkal.
4)The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Salem.
+1 cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Sr.Standing counsel, S.R.No.74/19
+1 cc to M/s.S.Surya Devi, Advocate, S.R.No.836/19
TCA.No.122 of 2018SSD(CO)SSM(13/02/2019)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.