In The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vadodara 3 v. M/S Kanaka Infratech Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1866 of 2019In R/TAX APPEAL NO. 687 of 2019
=============================================THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VADODARA 3
Versus
M/S KANAKA INFRATECH LTD
=============================================
Appearance:
MR.VARUN K.PATEL(3802) for the Applicant(s) No. 1RULE NOT RECD BACK(63) for the Respondent(s) No. 1=============================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAand
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.C. RAO
Date : 16/09/2019
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and having considered the averments made in this application, the delay of 20 days in preferring the Tax Appeal is hereby condoned.
The Civil Application is disposed of. Rule is made absolute accordingly.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
(A. C. RAO, J)
Dolly
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue